Biological fermentation pilot-scale systems and evaluation for commercial viability towards sustainable biohydrogen production

Theoretical basis

The principle of biological hydrogen production

When carbohydrate is used as the substrate, dark fermentation bacteria convert the sugar into hydrogen and small-molecular acids through several pathways, such as the acetic acid route, the butyric acid route, and the ethyl alcohol route, the specific metabolic pathway is related to the hydrogen-producing bacteria used35. The small-molecular acids finally stay in the fermentation liquid. However, since dark fermentation bacteria cannot use small-molecular acids as a carbon source to produce hydrogen, the hydrogen yield from dark fermentation remains low. Illuminated by sunlight, the photo-fermentation bacteria can turn the small-molecular acids and sugar into hydrogen through inherent photosynthesis. Based on the hydrogen production mechanisms of dark fermentation and photo fermentation, the fermentation liquid, which leaves the dark fermentation, can be adopted as the substrate for photo fermentation. The combination of these two fermentation approaches can help improve the conversion efficiency of the substrate (Supplementary Fig. 2 shows the biochemical process of biological hydrogen production).

Spectrum coupling

Light is the energy source for the growth and hydrogen generation of photosynthetic bacteria as well as a basic premise for their survival. Sunlight is adopted as the primary light source for fermentation by photosynthetic bacteria in this work. Each species of photosynthetic bacteria has a unique absorption spectrum, which depends on the type and amount of photo-fermentation pigments it contains, and each pigment has its specific absorption peaks. As shown in Fig. 1a the absorption spectrum characteristics of photosynthetic bacteria vary with the wavelength of solar radiation. The photosynthetic bacteria have obvious absorption peaks at 325 nm, 382 nm, 490 nm, 590 nm and 807 nm, 865 nm in the infrared light region, and photosynthetic bacteria can utilize these spectra (The reaction device is shown in Supplementary Fig. 3).

Fig. 1: Analysis of light absorption and growth characteristics of photosynthetic hydrogen-producing bacteria.
figure 1

a Characteristics of the absorption of photosynthetic bacteria. b photosynthetic bacteria growth and hydrogen production under different wavelengths (n = 3, independent experiments). c Photosynthetic bacteria growth and hydrogen production under different light sources (n = 3, independent experiments).

Then, the filters are used to screen the wavelengths suitable for the growth of photosynthetic bacteria and hydrogen production to eliminate the “light saturation effect” caused by the absorption of excessive light energy and obtain the coupling between photosynthetic bacteria and solar energy. The growth characteristics and hydrogen production effect of photosynthetic bacteria under different wavelengths are shown in Fig. 1b. The growth effect of photosynthetic bacteria is best under the 400 nm spectrum; the maximum cell dry weight can reach 3.55 g/L with the minimum hydrogen production. The maximum hydrogen production occurs at a wavelength of 600 nm, which is 4.16 mol H2/mol glucose. Therefore, the wavelength suitable for the growth of photosynthetic bacteria does not lead to a consistent hydrogen production effect. It appears that the activities of enzymes involved in hydrogen production occur at different wavelengths. Thus, light sources of different colors are selected to replace sunlight to ensure the efficient performance of the experiments in the absence of sunlight. The growth and hydrogen production characteristics of photosynthetic bacteria under different light sources (light-emitting-diodes (LEDs) purchased from Cree Shanghai Opto Development Limited) are shown in Fig. 1c. Photosynthetic bacteria show better growth and hydrogen production characteristics under yellow and blue light; the corresponding hydrogen production is 4.24 mol H2/mol glucose and 3.74 mol H2/mol glucose, respectively, which is higher than that of white light sources (LED). The reason might be due to the light emitted by white light sources is a composite light composed of multiple monochromatic lights, and higher radiation energy is absorbed by photosynthetic bacteria, resulting in the “light saturation effect” that reduces the activity of photosynthetic bacteria.

The aforementioned experimental design is illustrated in the supporting information.

Thermal effect

During the hydrogen production by photosynthetic bacteria, light irradiates the reaction system through the reactor. Part of the physical factors accepted by photosynthetic bacteria is converted into thermal energy and released directly, and part of the physical factors is absorbed by the biological system to increase the cell’s metabolism with the released thermal energy. For dark fermentation, only the latter occurs. The biological effects caused by the above impact are the thermal effect of hydrogen production of fermentation bacteria. The generated heat leads to increased temperature, which affects the strength of the enzyme activity, and then affects the hydrogen production efficiency. The experiments are designed to analyze the thermal effect of different initial temperatures and light intensities on hydrogen production, to provide a reference for the design of temperature control systems in pilot-scale reactors. For thermal effect experiments, the temperature-varying system experiment is carried out in a vacuum reaction bottle, the constant temperature system experiment is performed in regular glass bottles maintained at a constant temperature realized by the temperature control system. The reaction system involves several factors, such as the biochemical reaction, light source, and temperature control. (Supplementary Fig. 4 shows the heat energy transmission of the system. Supplementary Fig. 5 shows an illustration of the experiment equipment of the hydrogen production system on thermal effect.)

The temperature fluctuation of the temperature-varying system at different initial temperatures for the dark fermentation system and photo-fermentation system is shown in Fig. 2a, d. During the first 12 h of fermentation, the system temperature at different initial temperatures increases to a large extent. The system temperature rises slowly from 12 to 20 h, and remains basically stable after 20 h. The variation rate of the temperature does not show regularity with the change of the initial temperature for the fermentation system, but the variation rate of the temperature for photo fermentation is greater than that of dark fermentation, which may be caused by light radiation. The maximum temperature increment is 3.43 °C, detected in the photo-fermentation system with an initial temperature of 27 °C. The magnitude of the temperature change is 36 °C, 33 °C, 39 °C, and 30 °C for dark fermentation and is 27 °C, 30 °C, 24 °C, and 33 °C for photo fermentation. The heat production rate at different initial temperatures is shown in Fig. 2b, e. The heat production rate increases rapidly from 2 to 6 h for the dark fermentation system and then decreases until the system reaches heat balance, but for the photo-fermentation system, the heat production rate increases rapidly from 2 to 8 h, and then decreases. The reason can be explained by the fact that dark fermentation bacteria can quickly adapt to a fermentation environment to grow and produce hydrogen. The maximum heat generation rate (1.14 kJ/L·h) is detected in the photo-fermentation system with an initial temperature of 27 °C. Figure 2c, f shows the hydrogen production at different initial temperatures. At 30 °C and 33 °C in the dark fermentation system, 24 and 27 °C in the photo-fermentation system, the hydrogen production is affected by temperature fluctuations and is greater than that of the constant temperature system at the same initial temperature. The opposite situation occurs when the initial temperature is 36 and 39 °C in the dark fermentation system, 30 and 33 °C in the photo-fermentation system. The reason may be due to the activity of the enzyme is negatively affected by the temperature increase. The maximum hydrogen production occurs at 27 °C while the minimum occurs at 24 °C for the photo-fermentation system.

Fig. 2: Effects of operation temperature on hydrogen production system.
figure 2

Effects of operation temperature on hydrogen production system. Dark fermentation: a Temperature fluctuation of the system at different initial temperatures. b Heat production rate at different initial temperatures (n = 3, independent experiments). c Hydrogen production at different initial temperatures (n = 3, independent experiments). Photo fermentation: d Temperature fluctuation of the system at different initial temperatures. e Heat production rate at different initial temperatures (n = 3, independent experiments). f Hydrogen production at different initial temperatures (n = 3, independent experiments). (I: Temperature-varying system. II: Constant temperature system).

Table 1 illustrates the thermal effect on dinitrogenase (photo-fermentation bacteria)and hydrogenase (dark fermentation bacteria) activity at different initial temperatures. For photo-fermentation hydrogen production, at the initial temperature of 24 °C and 27 °C, with the heat accumulation, the dinitrogenase in the temperature-varying system is higher than that of the constant temperature system, which is opposite to the situations at 30 °C and 33 °C. With the change of initial temperature, the activities of enzymes increase and then decrease, which is consistent with the hydrogen production ability of photosynthetic bacteria in temperature-varying systems. During the dark fermentation process, the change trend in hydrogenase activity is the same as that of dinitrogenase of photosynthetic bacteria, the maximum hydrogenase activity was detected at the initial temperature of 33 °C in a temperature-varying system.

Table.1 The effect of operation temperature on enzyme activities

Photosynthetic bacteria require appropriate light intensity for hydrogen production. The light intensity affects the number of photons captured by the photosynthetic bacteria, the formation of ATP (Adenosine Triphosphate), and the proton gradient, and plays an important role in the hydrogen production of photosynthetic bacteria. The effects of different light intensities on the system temperature are shown in Fig. 3, the system temperature rises with increasing light intensity. When the light intensity is 500 Lx, the temperature fluctuation is the smallest, and the equilibrium temperature is 28.57 °C. The heat production rate at different light intensities is shown in Fig. 3b. The maximum heat generation rate occurred at 8 h for every system. When the light intensity is 3000 Lx, the maximum heat generation rate of the system is 1.32 kJ/(L·h). The light intensity, system temperature, and accumulated heat are consistent with the maximum heat production rate. Figure 3c shows the thermal effect on hydrogen production at different light intensities. The hydrogen production of a temperature-varying system is greater than that of a constant temperature system. The maximum hydrogen production occurs at the light intensity of 3000 Lx, the values are 894 mL and 652 mL for the temperature-varying system and constant temperature system.

Fig. 3: Effects of light intensities on hydrogen production system.
figure 3

Effects of light intensities on photo-fermentation hydrogen production system. a Temperature fluctuation of the system at different light intensities. b Heat production rate at different light intensities (n = 3, independent experiments). c Hydrogen production at different light intensities (n = 3, independent experiments).

Table 2 illustrates the results of the thermal effect on dinitrogenase activity at different light intensities. The enzyme activities with heat accumulation are higher than those without heat accumulation. The enzyme activities rise with the increase of light intensity, which is consistent with the hydrogen production ability of photosynthetic bacteria, which benefit from the thermal effect. Increasing the light intensity in a certain range is conducive to the improvement of the enzyme activities, and thus to the improvement of hydrogen production capacity.

Table 2 The effect of light intensities on enzyme activities

Liquid rheological properties of baffle plate reactor and multiphase flow

The liquid rheological properties and flow behavior are the main characteristics of hydrogen production. In view of the complexity of the fluid itself and the reaction process, this research simulated the velocity field and concentration field distribution, of a continuous hydrogen production system, providing a reference for optimizing the reactor structure. A mathematical model of the multiphase flow field was established, and the velocity, and concentration of material in the liquid were explored, to remove and reduce the liquid retention zone and liquid flow shock, and prolong the service life of the reactor. The rheological properties and simulation methods of this theory are presented in the supporting information. In the early stage of the reactor design, the baffle reactor is the most ideal reactor for continuous fermentation of hydrogen production. Mixing was accomplished by the flow of the fermentation media through the baffles in the bioreactors. Therefore, the baffle plate reactor was used in subsequent experiments. (The analytical methods were explained in the Supplementary Methods. The grid of the reacting region is shown in Supplementary Fig. 6)

The velocity field distribution of the mixture in the baffle plate reactor is shown in Fig. 4. The velocity of the inlet mixture is relatively high; after entering the reactor, the velocity of the fluid decreases rapidly due to the larger diameter. The fluid velocity tends to increase due to the sudden decrease in the diameter at the bottom of the baffle. The velocity of the mixture in the down-flow chamber is higher than the velocity in the up-flow chamber. There is a vortex at each baffle position, and the maximum velocity of the reaction system is 0.412 m/s. Each compartment has a detention zone and the area with a lower velocity in the entire reactor account for almost 1/6th. The reactor design should minimize the detention zone, and enhance the stirring effect to improve the efficiency of the hydrogen production, which can be achieved by improving the reactor design or increasing the feed rate.

Fig. 4: Characteristics of velocity distribution of mixture in reactor.
figure 4

Simulation of the velocity distribution of mixture in a baffled biohydrogen production reactor.

The concentration field distribution of the mixture is shown in Fig. 5, and the situation of the liquid phase is shown in Fig. 5a. From the height of the mixture lifted by the fluid flow at the bottom, it can be concluded that the concentration of the liquid phase at the bottom of the reactor decreased from 97.0% at the beginning to 84.9%–87.9% in the yellow-red part. The concentration of the yellow part changes from 81.8% to 84.9%; the light green area has a concentration of 75.8% and occupies the largest area. The minimum value of the liquid phase concentration is 39.6%, which appeared in the solid precipitate at the up-flow chamber. The above conditions are consistent with the actual operation of the reactor. The solid-phase concentration distribution is shown in Fig. 5b. The concentration distribution of the solid phase is exactly the opposite of the concentration distribution of the liquid phase. The solid-phase concentration increases from the upper part of the reactor to the bottom, and there is little difference in the solid-phase concentration at the same position in each compartment. The pushing movement causes the precipitated solid particles to move forward, and most of them are collected in the upstream chamber. The height and concentration of solid-phase distribution in the upstream chamber are larger than that in the downstream chamber, which is opposite to the liquid phase. These experiments show that there is an obvious concentration gradient and mass transfer in the baffled hydrogen production system. The fluid flow is conducive to the uniform distribution of concentration and mass. As a result of the baffles, the stirring effect of the reactor is enhanced, which achieves the function of automatic feed mixing and reduces energy waste.

Fig. 5: Simulation analysis of solid and liquid phase concentration distribution in baffled plate biohydrogen production reactor.
figure 5

a Liquid phase concentration field distribution. b Solid-phase concentration field distribution.

Pilot-scale experimental device

A pilot-scale baffled bioreactor for sequential dark and photo-fermentation continuous hydrogen production was established, based on previous research results36,37. The structural dimensions were described in detail in previous articles36,38,39 (Supplementary Fig. 7. shows the system structure diagram of pilot-scale baffled continuous flow dark and photo-fermentation hydrogen production reactor). During dark fermentation, hydrogen generation substrate (pH = 5.5) and dark fermentation bacteria are injected at a fixed ratio of 4:1 from the rightmost tank, by a peristaltic pump. When the liquid level in the first chamber is higher than the inter-chamber baffle, the liquid will flow into the second chamber, and the third chamber, in the same way. When dark fermentation is carried out alone, the liquid fermentation waste will be discharged from the liquid outlet after fermentation in the tank. For the hydrogen production system, a mixing chamber and a dark fermentation broth treatment chamber are located between the dark fermentation unit and the photo-fermentation unit. By regulating the flow valve, the fermentation liquid from the dark fermentation is diverted from the liquid outlet to the dark fermentation broth treatment chamber, where the liquid undergoes zeolite treatment (removing excessive ammonium ions) and ultraviolet sterilization. It then goes into the mixing chamber to be mixed with photo-fermentation substrate, and regulated in pH value (pH = 7). After that, the fermentation liquid enters the photo-fermentation tank through the peristaltic pump at a ratio of 4:1 to the photo-fermentation bacteria. After the fermentation in the last chamber, the fermentation liquid is discharged from the liquid outlet. Every tank is provided with an ascending cubicle and a descending cubicle. The ascending cubicle acts as the major photoreaction area. To ensure enough area for photoreaction, the volume of the ascending cubicle is four times larger than that of the descending one; to meet the sunlight demand during photo-fermentation hydrogen production, a light source is placed within a circular glass tube, and then into the fermentation liquid. During the daytime, sunlight is transmitted into the reactor via the solar tracer and light concentrator to provide light; however, on cloudy, rainy days or night time, the lighting comes from the LED lamp (composition of yellow LED and blue LED). Electricity required for the operation of the reaction device is supplied by a storage battery, which saves the energy generated by solar panels36,39. In the periphery of the reactor, an insulating layer is provided. The hydrogen production system depends on circulating hot water from the solar water heater, to maintain its operating temperature. In order to reduce heat loss around the reactor, insulating material is stuffed into the periphery of the device.

Circulating hot water maintains the reaction temperature. The real-world operating system of the experimental equipment is shown in Fig. 6a (Supplementary Fig. 8. shows the 3D view of the reactors).

Fig. 6: Composition and operational analysis of dark and photo-fermentation hydrogen production reactor system.
figure 6

a Real-world operation system. b hydrogen production rate of the fermentation system.

During fermentation, the generated gas enters the gas tank through the gas pipe

Enzymatic hydrolysate of corn straw(reducing sugar) is used, at a concentration of 25 g/L, as the substrate for hydrogen production via the dark and photo-fermentation hydrogen production device. First, the reactor was operated in batch mode for 30 d to enrich the functional strains, and then the system was switched to a continuous model. After two weeks of operation, the system tends to stabilize. During the two-year operation period, the operating process was optimized36,38,39. Once we have collected data for 20 days of stable operation, as shown in Fig. 7b, the average hydrogen production rate of the dark fermentation unit is 15.04 m3/m3-d, and the average hydrogen production rate of the photosynthetic fermentation is 8.26 m3/m3-d. Through calculation, it can be found that the device can produce 10 kg of hydrogen per day. The average hydrogen production rate obtained in the paper was higher than that of semi-pilot-scale up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor40 and packed bed biofilm reactor41. For the pilot-scale hydrogen production system in the paper, each chamber is a baffled reactor and can independently ferment for hydrogen production, which shows good flexibility and scalability to meet the construction of fermentation systems of different scales. For a continuous hydrogen production system, the stable and continuous generation of hydrogen is an important goal, which may be achieved under a high organic loading rate, leading to the loss of residual hydrogen-producing bacteria and a certain amount of organic matter in the tail liquid after fermentation. Therefore, some technologies should be adopted to treat the hydrogen production tail liquid to achieve efficient utilization of substrates, such as the preparation of liquid organic fertilizer, and methane production from hydrogen production tail liquid. (See the supporting information for the experimental process and other operational data.)

Fig. 7: Life cycle environmental impact of hydrogen production of dark and photo fermentation.
figure 7

T1: Straw pulverization; T2: Enzymolysis; T3: Hydrogen production.

Energy consumption analysis

In the process of hydrogen production by fermentation, energy consumption can be divided into three stages: (1) pulverization stage, (2) enzymolysis stage, and (3) fermentation stage.

During the pulverization stage, the energy consumption comes primarily from the raw material crusher. For the enzymolysis stage, the energy required includes both heat to maintain the hydrolysis temperature and mechanical energy for the agitator operation. During the fermentation stage, energy consumption mainly comes from feeding devices, lighting devices, mixing devices, and online monitoring systems. Results show that the dark and photo-fermentation system consumes 171,530 MJ to generate 1 t hydrogen (171.53 MJ/kg H2), this is supplied by solar energy, which is close to the energy consumption of green hydrogen production by electrolysis water using solar and wind energy (183.58 MJ/kg H242, 150.10 MJ/kg H243, 168.82 MJ/kg H243). But the energy consumption is lower than that of hydrogen production via using deep in-situ gasification-based coal-to-hydrogen (349.55 MJ/kg H2)44. During the operation, energy consumption mainly occurs in the enzymolysis stage at 53.04%, the pulverization stage at 9.76%, and the fermentation stage at 37.2%. In the future, research on high-activity cellulase and high solid-phase enzyme hydrolysis technology should be followed to reduce to reduce the energy consumption of enzyme hydrolysis processes.

Energy consumption is one resulting aspect of the environment from the hydrogen production system. To analyze the environmental impact of such systems in detail, it is necessary to perform a life cycle environmental assessment. The following sections will elaborate on this assessment of the hydrogen production system.

Environmental impact analysis

Life cycle inventory

According to ISO 14040 and ISO 1404445, LCA for hydrogen production systems is made by using SimaPro 8.5based on ReCiPe2016 Midpoint method46. The life cycle data are collected mostly from China and supplemented with the database in Ecoivent 3.1 so that the assessment results can be more representative in China. ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H), adopted in the life cycle assessment, incorporates 18 categories: (1) Global warming (GW), (2) Stratospheric ozone depletion (SOD), (3) Ionizing radiation (IR), (4) Ozone formation, Human health (OFHH), (5) Fine particulate matter formation (FPMF), (6) Ozone formation, Terrestrial ecosystems (OFTE), (7) Terrestrial acidification (TA), (8) Freshwater eutrophication (FEP), (9) Marine eutrophication (MEP), (10) Terrestrial ecotoxicity (TE), (11) Freshwater ecotoxicity (FE), (12) Marine ecotoxicity (ME), (13) Human carcinogenic toxicity (HCT), (14) Human non-carcinogenic toxicity (HNCT), (15) Land use (LU), (16) Mineral resource scarcity (MRS), (17) Fossil resource scarcity (FRS), (18) Water consumption (WC).

The functional unit is 1 metric ton of H2. The boundaries of the fermentation system are listed in Supplementary Fig. 10. A list of energy consumption from the straw pulverization to the ending of hydrogen production is listed in Supplementary Table 1.

Figure 7 demonstrates the life cycle environment impacts and their contribution to different life cycle stages of hydrogen production systems calculated by the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) method. During the life cycle of hydrogen production by dark and photo fermentation, the contribution to GW is 9.37 t CO2 eq in producing 1 t hydrogen (9.37 kg CO2 eq/kg H2). The GW for the hydrogen production system, the GW was mainly originated from the hydrogen production process, was over 60% of the total amount. The reason may be due to the addition of chemical reagents during the fermentation stage. This provides a research direction for us to reduce GW from biological hydrogen production processes. Supplementary Table 2 shows the GW from different hydrogen production technologies. The GW of hydrogen production via biomass gasification and coal gasification is approximately 10.56 kg CO2 eq/kg H247 and 18 kg CO2 eq/kg48, respectively. The GW of green hydrogen production via water electrolysis using wind power or solar power shows a lower value varying from 9.4 to 0.3 kg CO2 eq/kg49,50. But renewable power generation is limited by land area available for photovoltaic panels and/or wind turbines, when the grid electricity is used to compensate for insufficient wind or solar electricity, the GW could reach to 25.93 CO2 eq/kg H251. Compared to green hydrogen production via water electrolysis, the biological fermentation hydrogen production system exhibits advantages in resource recycling and simultaneously achieving waste treatment and clean energy production. With the application of carbon capture and storage technology, the preparation process of materials gradually becomes cleaner, which will help reduce the GW of the biological fermentation hydrogen production system.

Through literature comparison, it was also found that different biomass conversion technologies exhibit different emission reduction capabilities based on LCA52,53,54, caused by the differences in assessment methods, functional units, and system boundaries55, but the final results all indicate development and utilization of biomass helps to net-zero emissions.

Sensitivity analysis

Cellulase is an indispensable reagent for straw hydrolysis, which can hydrolyze large-molecule glucans into small-molecule organic saccharides. The activity of cellulase determines the dosage of cellulose and further affects the whole hydrogen production life cycle on the environmental impact. With advancements in science and technology, the activity of cellulase will be gradually improved. This study supposes the cellulase activity is raised by 15%, its dosage will be reduced by 15% under the same conditions, the scheme was defined as S1. The environmental impact is compared before and after the change. In addition, an improvement in cellulase activity can also alleviate the inhibiting effect of reducing sugar during enzymolysis. It can be found that citric acid and sodium citrate during enzymolysis have made a significant contribution to the environmental impact. Thus, another hypothesis is proposed here: based on improved cellulase activity, the solid-to-liquid ratio dosage of cellulase should be changed (from 1:10 to 1:8); this scheme was defined as S2 (The analysis process is shown in supplementary). By comparison, it can be found that the decrease in the solid-to-liquid ratio (S2) can minimize the environmental impact in the life cycle of hydrogen production systems due to the increase in solid-to-liquid ratio and decrease the consumption of substances. (See the supporting information for the experimental process and other operational data.)

Life cycle costing assessment

Cost estimation

The hydrogen production system is expected to work for 20 years in total, and 360 days per year. The depreciation rate of the fixed asset is 5%52; raw material purchasing price is determined by the local market; annual maintenance cost accounts for about 1.5% of the fixed assets56. The project is constructed in a tertiary administrative region in China, so the salary of the laborers refers to the lowest wage standard in such region. Based on market reagent price, water, and power charge, and other expenditures, the reagent expense for operating the experiments of the hydrogen production system can be calculated. For the designed dark and photo-fermentation system, cost of 43,875.16 CNY / t H2 (5999.5 $/t or 5.6 $/kg). Compared with other reported results, the hydrogen obtained from the combined system shows better market competitiveness (Supplementary Table 3).

These economic estimates are offered in the Supplementary Note 6. Table 3 provides information about the annual profit and loss statement and dynamic economic analysis of the whole project.

Table 3 Capital investment and cost analysis

When the (net present value) NPV > 0, it means the plan is economically feasible. Tp is the investment payback period, and IRR is the internal return of rate. When the IRR is higher than the benchmark discount rate (8%), the project has a favorable economic effect31. According to the market price at the project site, the sale price of hydrogen is set at 56 CHY/kg (7.65$/kg). Based on the data of Table 3, the financial net present value (NPV) of dark and photo-fermentation system is 584,400 CNY (79,843$/kg), the investment payback periods are estimated to be 6.86 years and IRR is 16.84% for dark and photo-fermentation system, the payback period is lower than 10.28 years for hydrogen production with water electrolysis (IRR 10.28%)57. (Supplementary Table 4)

Back To Top